Accessible Learning Labs

Standards and technical practice

Conformance, assistive technology, and the gap between the two. What a standard requires, and why meeting it does not always mean a person can use the thing.

Screen reader and keyboard optimised version. All content is presented in reading order, with no diagram, tabs, or scripting. An interactive map version presents the same content as a navigable diagram.

Section 1 of four

How this landscape is organized

This is the accessibility work of a learning design practice, gathered in one place. It draws on two branches: Accessibility, which concerns access at the level of an individual person and the obligation an institution holds toward them, and Universal Design for Learning, which concerns designing for the predictable range of learners before any individual request is made. The two are related but not the same, and the arrangement here keeps them distinct while showing where they meet.

Resources are arranged in seven groups by what they are for, rather than by which branch they grow on. A group therefore holds resources from both branches where the question they answer is shared. Each resource names its home branch so the distinction is never lost. Groups are given in alphabetical order, followed by the three engagements that draw on them.

Every resource states the bodies of knowledge it rests on and cites its sources by number to the reference list in Section 4. Every resource on this page is practised; where it is marked as in development, the grounding and sources are settled and the written resource is not yet published.

This landscape zooms into two branches of the learning design practice mapped at andrearobin.com, where the trunk is Groundwork, the learning design method. The contributions here that do not appear on that map are made possible by Fieldwork, the research method practised at Accessible Learning Labs.

Two kinds of relationship are given for each resource. Most related is calculated from sources and themes held in common, and surfaces resources that answer similar questions from different groups. Connected resources are the direct relationships recorded on the map — the resources a reader is likely to need alongside this one.

Section 2 of four

What is here

15 resources in this group — 13 from Accessibility and 2 from Universal Design for Learning.

Visit the Standards and technical practice page · All seven groups and the engagements in one page

Section 3 of four

Every resource, in full

Sources are written out in full here as well as numbered, so that following a reference is never necessary to understand an entry.

Standards and technical practice

Conformance, assistive technology, and the gap between the two. What a standard requires, and why meeting it does not always mean a person can use the thing.

Accessibility Triage for Existing Course Inventories

A defensible order of work when everything cannot be fixed at once

Practised · resource in development

Most institutions hold thousands of documents, modules, videos, and pages built before anyone was checking, with no realistic path to full conformance. This resource offers a tiered protocol — what is remediated now, what is rebuilt at next revision, what is retired, and which standard applies to each tier — using high-volume required and compliance training as the worked example.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Accessibility · Well established

Grounding. WCAG 2.2; EN 301 549; remediation prioritisation

Practised in. Mandatory-training audits and redesign in a provincial public-sector organisation

Themes. Standards, Access, Scale

Sources

  • Reference 15: W3C (2023). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. W3C Recommendation.
  • Reference 25: ETSI/CEN/CENELEC (2021). EN 301 549 V3.2.1: Accessibility Requirements for ICT Products and Services. Harmonised European Standard.

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Designing for the Assistive Technology People Actually Use

Why conformant content can still fail in practice

Practised · resource in development

Conformance and assistive-technology fluency are not the same thing, and the difference shows quickly in real use. This resource covers testing with actual assistive technology rather than automated checking alone, and the reasons technically conformant material can still obstruct — while leaving assessment, tool matching, and training to the assistive technology specialists and advisors whose professional work that is.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Accessibility · Well established

Grounding. SETT framework (Zabala); HAAT model (Cook & Polgar); WCAG 2.2

Practised in. Screen-reader and keyboard testing in a provincial public-sector organisation; adaptive technology stations at an art and design university; AAC support in private home care

Themes. Standards, Access, Disability studies

Sources

  • Reference 17: Zabala, J. S. (2005). Ready, SETT, Go! Getting Started with the SETT Framework — the Student, Environments, Tasks, Tools framework for assistive technology decision-making.
  • Reference 16: Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2015). Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice (4th ed.). Elsevier — the source of the Human Activity Assistive Technology (HAAT) model.
  • Reference 15: W3C (2023). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. W3C Recommendation.

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Accessible Physical and Hybrid Learning Environments

The part of universal design most often handed to facilities

Practised · resource in development

The seven principles of universal design as they were originally written — for buildings, spaces, and products — and what they require of a classroom, a laboratory, a placement site, and the hybrid arrangements that now carry a large share of teaching. It is the part of universal design that learning designers most often hand to facilities management, and the part that determines whether a person can be present in the room at all.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Accessibility · Well established

Grounding. Principles of Universal Design (Connell et al., 1997); CSA B651; Accessible Canada Act

Practised in. Studio layouts and wayfinding at an art and design university; classroom residencies for an arts education non-profit

Themes. Access, Variability, Standards

Sources

  • Reference 35: Connell, B. R., Jones, M., Mace, R., Mueller, J., Mullick, A., Ostroff, E., Sanford, J., Steinfeld, E., Story, M., & Vanderheiden, G. (1997). The Principles of Universal Design, Version 2.0. Center for Universal Design, North Carolina State University.
  • Reference 54: CSA Group. CSA B651: Accessible Design for the Built Environment. Canadian Standards Association.
  • Reference 29: Accessible Canada Act, S.C. 2019, c. 10.

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Accessible Documents as Everyday Practice

Structure at the point of authoring, not repair

Practised · resource in development

Headings, reading order, tables, alternative text and contrast across word processing files, presentations, spreadsheets and PDF, treated as authoring practice. Remediation costs more than creation, which places institutional templates among the highest-leverage points of intervention. It also covers what an automated checker establishes and what it leaves untested.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Accessibility · Well established

Grounding. PDF/UA (ISO 14289-1); WCAG 2.2; CAN/ASC-EN 301 549:2024

Practised in. Accessible templates (PDFs, forms) in a provincial public-sector organisation; alt text and simplified layouts at a national research laboratory

Themes. Standards, Access, Evaluation

Sources

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Captions, Transcripts and Audio Description

Three artefacts, three sets of users

Practised · resource in development

Captions, transcripts and audio description serve different users and do not substitute for one another. This resource covers caption accuracy and the degradation of automatic captioning on the specialist vocabulary that carries the most meaning, the transcript as an independently useful artefact, standard and extended audio description, and where each belongs in a production workflow and a budget.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Accessibility · Well established

Grounding. W3C Media Accessibility User Requirements; WCAG 2.2; multimedia learning research

Practised in. Captioning and multimodal STEM modules with transcripts at a national research laboratory

Themes. Standards, Access

Sources

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Selecting Materials, Textbooks and Platforms

Reading a conformance claim against what a person meets

Practised · resource in development

Publisher platforms, courseware, library resources and open educational resources, and the accessibility settled at the point of selection. It covers reading an Accessibility Conformance Report against what a person using the product encounters, what to ask a vendor, what to ask a colleague already using the tool, and the options remaining when an inaccessible product is already in service.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Accessibility · Emerging

Grounding. VPAT and Accessibility Conformance Reports; EN 301 549; CAN/ASC-EN 301 549:2024

Themes. Standards, Policy, Access

Sources

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Making Accessibility More Than Compliance

Access as design quality, not a checklist

Practised · resource in development

Treating accessibility as a dimension of good design rather than a minimum legal standard met at the end. It is the conceptual bridge from inclusive learning design to the accessibility, disability and accommodation branch, and to the engagements offered alongside it.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Universal Design for Learning · Emerging

Grounding. WCAG; UDL; inclusive design

Themes. Access

Sources

  • Reference 15: W3C (2023). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. W3C Recommendation.
  • Reference 2: CAST (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines, version 3.0.

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Evaluating Whether Design Reduced Barriers

Closing the UDL cycle with evidence

Practised · resource in development

Measuring whether an inclusive design actually lowered barriers, rather than assuming that it did — ending on rigor rather than aspiration. It belongs to the shared evaluation family that runs across the practice.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Universal Design for Learning · Well established

Grounding. Evaluation design; Universal Design for Learning

Practised in. Accessibility KPIs in a provincial public-sector organisation; accessibility-first evaluation at a national technology education provider; iterative program evaluation at a national research laboratory; equity evaluation of placements at a research university

Themes. Evaluation, Access

Sources

  • Reference 55: Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler.
  • Reference 2: CAST (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines, version 3.0.

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Accessibility Remediation of Mandatory Training at Organisational Scale

The compliance training everyone must take, made usable by everyone

Practised · resource in development

Required training is the one learning experience every employee meets, and it is usually the least accessible thing the organisation owns. This resource covers auditing high-volume mandatory modules against screen-reader and keyboard use, redesigning them, building the templates that keep the next version accessible, and advising the departments that own the content on what conformance actually requires of them. It is the worked example behind the triage protocol.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Accessibility · Well established

Grounding. WCAG 2.1/2.2; EN 301 549 and CAN/ASC-EN 301 549; remediation prioritisation

Practised in. A provincial public-sector organisation during a province-wide service transition: audits and redesign of mandatory safety and privacy training for screen-reader and keyboard compatibility; accessible templates and facilitation toolkits; cross-departmental WCAG 2.1 compliance advising

Themes. Standards, Access, Scale

Sources

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Accessible Live and Virtual Facilitation

Access in the room, and in the room that is a screen

Practised · resource in development

Facilitation is where accessibility standards meet a person in real time: captions that lag, a chat that a screen reader cannot follow, a breakout that leaves someone behind, a slide that only works in colour. This resource covers accessible design of live and virtual sessions — platform settings, materials, pacing, participation modes, and in-session audits — so that facilitation is accessible by default rather than repaired on request.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Accessibility · Well established

Grounding. WCAG for live content; Media Accessibility User Requirements; adult learning practice

Practised in. A provincial public-sector organisation: province-wide e-facilitation rollout supporting remote learners through accessible technology; a national research laboratory: inclusive facilitation workshops with accessibility audits during live sessions

Themes. Access, Standards, Capacity

Sources

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Sensory Access in Learning Environments

Noise, light, crowding, and the right to leave

Practised · resource in development

Physical accessibility standards address doors, ramps, and reach ranges; they say little about sound, light, density, and the availability of a place to withdraw. This resource covers sensory-informed design of learning spaces and events — quiet hours, noise indicators, lighting options, rest areas, tactile and non-speaking modes — and the piloting that shows which measures the people concerned actually use.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Accessibility · Emerging

Grounding. Relational approaches to access and autism (Davidson); universal design of space; co-design

Practised in. A science centre: sensory-friendly exhibit prototypes and quiet-hours programming; an arts education non-profit working in schools: sensory-informed classroom planning (noise-level indicators, soft lighting, rest areas), tactile art kits, sensory avatars and non-speaking arts co-designed with children and teachers

Themes. Access, Standards, Disability studies

Sources

  • Reference 54: CSA Group. CSA B651: Accessible Design for the Built Environment. Canadian Standards Association.
  • Reference 35: Connell, B. R., Jones, M., Mace, R., Mueller, J., Mullick, A., Ostroff, E., Sanford, J., Steinfeld, E., Story, M., & Vanderheiden, G. (1997). The Principles of Universal Design, Version 2.0. Center for Universal Design, North Carolina State University.
  • Reference 71: Davidson, J. (2010). “‘It cuts both ways’: A relational approach to access and accommodation for autism.” Social Science & Medicine, 70(2), 305–312.

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Accessibility Review

Four bodies of knowledge held in view at once

Published resource

How to review a learning environment while holding four bodies of knowledge in view at once: conformance standards, Universal Design for Learning, disability studies, and the systems that decide what gets built. It sets out the stages of a review, the decisions it turns on, and why its findings reach further than a surface-level compliance check.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Accessibility · Well established

Grounding. WCAG; UDL; disability studies; systems knowledge

Practised in. Mandatory-training audits in a provincial public-sector organisation; live-session audits at a national research laboratory; an accessibility-first evaluation framework at a national technology education provider

Themes. Access, Evaluation

Sources

  • Reference 15: W3C (2023). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. W3C Recommendation.
  • Reference 2: CAST (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines, version 3.0.

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Interpreting, Live Captioning, Note-Taking and Alternate Formats

Access services as service design

Practised · resource in development

Sign language interpreting, real-time captioning, note-taking and alternate-format production each depend on providers, lead times and preparation. The challenge is that a service arranged late, or without the course materials, may not provide the access it was approved to provide. This resource sets out what each service does and for whom, what has to be requested and how far ahead, the legal basis for producing alternate formats in Canada, and what an instructor contributes to making each service effective.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Accessibility · Well established

Grounding. W3C Media Accessibility User Requirements; Marrakesh Treaty; Copyright Act (Canada), s. 32; Eldridge (SCC, 1997); PDF/UA

Themes. Standards, Access, Accommodation

Sources

  • Reference 59: W3C (2015). Media Accessibility User Requirements. W3C Working Group Note.
    W3C (2015). Media Accessibility User Requirements. W3C Working Group Note
  • Reference 45: World Intellectual Property Organization (2013). Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled.
  • Reference 81: Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42, s. 32 — reproduction in alternate format for persons with perceptual disabilities.
  • Reference 89: Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624 — sign language interpretation as a condition of equal access to a public service.
  • Reference 58: ISO 14289-1:2014. Document Management Applications — Electronic Document File Format Enhancement for Accessibility — Part 1: Use of ISO 32000-1 (PDF/UA-1). International Organization for Standardization.

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Delivering Accommodated Exams in a Learning Platform

Timing, attempts and assistive technology

Practised · resource in development

When an exam is delivered in a learning platform, the accommodation has to be configured there as well. The challenge is that platform settings, lockdown browsers and remote proctoring can conflict with the assistive technology a student uses. This resource covers individual time and attempt adjustments, question formats and their compatibility with screen readers, magnification and dictation, and what to verify before an exam opens. It includes a test routine that an instructor or exam team can run in advance with the student’s own set-up.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Accessibility · Well established

Grounding. WCAG 2.2; CAN/ASC-EN 301 549:2024; construct validity (Messick); research on extended time (Lovett)

Themes. Standards, Assessment, Access

Sources

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Adapting Test Papers to Alternate Formats

A secure, time-critical document in an accessible format

Practised · resource in development

A test paper has to be converted to an accessible format quickly and without being disclosed. The challenge is to do that while keeping it the same assessment. This resource covers preparing a paper for a screen reader such as JAWS, for text-to-speech such as Kurzweil, for dictation such as Dragon, and for large print and braille; describing a figure without supplying the answer; keeping the paper secure during conversion; and checking that the converted paper measures what the original measures.

Group. Standards and technical practice

Home branch. Accessibility · Well established

Grounding. PDF/UA (ISO 14289-1); WCAG 2.2; Copyright Act (Canada), s. 32; HAAT model (Cook & Polgar); construct validity (Messick)

Themes. Standards, Access, Accommodation

Sources

  • Reference 58: ISO 14289-1:2014. Document Management Applications — Electronic Document File Format Enhancement for Accessibility — Part 1: Use of ISO 32000-1 (PDF/UA-1). International Organization for Standardization.
  • Reference 15: W3C (2023). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. W3C Recommendation.
    W3C (2023). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. W3C Recommendation
  • Reference 81: Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42, s. 32 — reproduction in alternate format for persons with perceptual disabilities.
  • Reference 16: Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2015). Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice (4th ed.). Elsevier — the source of the Human Activity Assistive Technology (HAAT) model.
  • Reference 37: Messick, S. (1995). “Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons’ Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning.” American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749.

Most related, by shared source and theme

Connected resources

Section 4 of four

References and resources

The theory, law, and standards these resources are rooted in, listed once and cited by number above. Peer-reviewed, statutory, and institutional sources link directly. Books, reports, and legislation are cited in full so they can be found in any library catalogue or official register.

  1. Assessment37. Messick, S. (1995). “Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons’ Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning.” American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749.
  2. Assessment79. Lovett, B. J. (2010). “Extended Time Testing Accommodations for Students With Disabilities: Answers to Five Fundamental Questions.” Review of Educational Research, 80(4), 611–638.
    Lovett, B. J. (2010). “Extended Time Testing Accommodations for Students With Disabilities: Answers…
  3. Copyright and alternate formats81. Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42, s. 32 — reproduction in alternate format for persons with perceptual disabilities.
  4. Human rights law89. Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624 — sign language interpretation as a condition of equal access to a public service.
  5. International instruments45. World Intellectual Property Organization (2013). Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled.
  6. Universal Design for Learning2. CAST (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines, version 3.0.
    CAST (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines, version 3.0
  7. Learning sciences4. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  8. Accessibility standards15. W3C (2023). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. W3C Recommendation.
    W3C (2023). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. W3C Recommendation
  9. Assistive technology16. Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2015). Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice (4th ed.). Elsevier — the source of the Human Activity Assistive Technology (HAAT) model.
  10. Assistive technology17. Zabala, J. S. (2005). Ready, SETT, Go! Getting Started with the SETT Framework — the Student, Environments, Tasks, Tools framework for assistive technology decision-making.
  11. Accessibility standards25. ETSI/CEN/CENELEC (2021). EN 301 549 V3.2.1: Accessibility Requirements for ICT Products and Services. Harmonised European Standard.
    ETSI/CEN/CENELEC (2021). EN 301 549 V3.2.1: Accessibility Requirements for ICT Products and Services.…
  12. Accessibility standards26. Information Technology Industry Council. Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT) and Accessibility Conformance Reports.
    Information Technology Industry Council. Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT) and Accessibility…
  13. Adult learning28. Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The Adult Learner (8th ed.). Routledge.
  14. Accessibility law29. Accessible Canada Act, S.C. 2019, c. 10.
    Accessible Canada Act, S.C. 2019, c. 10
  15. Universal design35. Connell, B. R., Jones, M., Mace, R., Mueller, J., Mullick, A., Ostroff, E., Sanford, J., Steinfeld, E., Story, M., & Vanderheiden, G. (1997). The Principles of Universal Design, Version 2.0. Center for Universal Design, North Carolina State University.
  16. Built environment54. CSA Group. CSA B651: Accessible Design for the Built Environment. Canadian Standards Association.
  17. Evaluation55. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler.
  18. Accessibility standards58. ISO 14289-1:2014. Document Management Applications — Electronic Document File Format Enhancement for Accessibility — Part 1: Use of ISO 32000-1 (PDF/UA-1). International Organization for Standardization.
  19. Accessibility standards59. W3C (2015). Media Accessibility User Requirements. W3C Working Group Note.
    W3C (2015). Media Accessibility User Requirements. W3C Working Group Note
  20. Accessibility standards61. CAN/ASC-EN 301 549:2024. Accessibility Requirements for ICT Products and Services (EN 301 549:2021, IDT). Accessibility Standards Canada, published 31 May 2024, available free of charge.
    CAN/ASC-EN 301 549:2024. Accessibility Requirements for ICT Products and Services (EN 301 549:2021, IDT).…
  21. Sensory access71. Davidson, J. (2010). “‘It cuts both ways’: A relational approach to access and accommodation for autism.” Social Science & Medicine, 70(2), 305–312.

Back to contents

Every resource on this page reflects applied work carried out with learners, design teams, and partner organizations, and is grounded in the scholarship listed above. An interactive version of this map presents the same content as a navigable diagram.