Accessible Learning Labs Tool 03 — Linear Version
Tool 03Environment Scanner
Screen reader and keyboard-optimised version. This is a fully linear, plain-structure version of this tool with no animations, JavaScript interactions, or visual-only content. All prompts and response fields are presented in reading order. An interactive version with a rotating 3D object and dynamic context selection is also available. This page is derived from the case study A Graduate Student Finished Their Degree.
Select a context below and work through the questions in that section. Record your observations in each field. The tool does not generate responses or interpret what you observe. That work is yours — because it cannot be anyone else's.
How to use this tool
Identify the learning environment you are scanning and go to that section. Work through the questions in order. Be specific — note what you observe, not what you expect or assume. If you are uncertain, record that uncertainty. Each question asks you to look at the environment, not at the person within it.
Using this tool with others
This tool can be used alone or with others, including the person whose environment is being scanned. Where possible, the most complete scan involves that person directly. If they are not present, note that in your observations — their absence may itself be relevant to what the scan surfaces.
↑ Back to contentsPhysical classroom Lecture, seminar, tutorial space
Questions for scanning a physical classroom, lecture theatre, seminar room, or tutorial space.
Consider arrival, seating arrangements, participation formats, and assessment. Note where that requirement occurs and what it involves.
Consider session length, break frequency, and pacing. Note where those assumptions are made explicit and where they are implicit.
Consider questioning, discussion, group work, and formative participation. Note which of these are central to the learning outcomes.
Consider how accommodations are requested, how participation norms are communicated, and where information about support is located.
Consider sightlines, acoustics, proximity to exits, and flexibility of seating arrangements.
Consider what is currently available, how it is communicated, and whether using it requires a student to draw attention to themselves.
Online or asynchronous LMS, recorded content, digital delivery
Questions for scanning an online or asynchronous course, including LMS-based delivery, recorded content, and digital-only formats.
Consider internet connectivity, device access, available study space, noise levels, and personal or caring responsibilities.
Consider camera expectations, live participation requirements, and audio or video-based assessments.
Trace the navigation path from a student's starting point. Note where interpretation is required and where the path is straightforward.
Consider captions, transcripts, document structure, and any format that has dependencies on software, bandwidth, or prior familiarity.
Consider whether support is synchronous or asynchronous, how it is located, and what a student is required to do or disclose to access it.
Consider deadlines, synchronous session schedules, and participation windows.
Hybrid or blended Mixed in-person and online participation
Questions for scanning a hybrid or blended environment where students participate both in person and online, simultaneously or across different sessions.
Consider what is visible, audible, and interactive for each group. Note where the experiences diverge and where they are equivalent.
Consider disability, geographic location, caring responsibilities, transport, and health. Note how the design accounts for the range of reasons a student may be remote.
Consider informal interaction, visual materials, group activities, and spontaneous moments. Note which of these carry learning value.
Consider audio and video failures, platform outages, and connectivity issues. Note what a student is expected to manage independently.
Consider how questions are taken, how participation is invited, and how the facilitator monitors engagement across both groups.
Note whether online participation is positioned as a primary mode or as an alternative to in-person attendance.
Field or experiential Placement, practicum, community-based learning
Questions for scanning a field placement, practicum, internship, or community-based learning experience.
Consider disclosure to the institution, the host site, and individual supervisors. Note what each disclosure involves and who holds that information.
List the demands as specifically as possible. Note which are directly tied to the learning outcomes and which are features of the placement context.
Consider who is involved, what the timeline is, and how the student's role in the process is defined.
Consider what is standardised across placements and what varies. Note where variability affects access.
Consider travel time and cost, equipment requirements, language, and any cultural or contextual factors specific to the placement setting.
Consider whether support is initiated by the student or offered proactively, and what is required to access it.
Laboratory or studio Practical, hands-on, making
Questions for scanning a laboratory, studio, workshop, or any hands-on practical learning environment.
Consider posture, duration of standing or sitting, fine motor tasks, physical reach, and the use of specific equipment. Note which requirements are central to the learning outcomes.
Consider timed tasks, demonstration under observation, and the pace of group work.
Consider public critique, peer observation, and any formats where individual work is assessed in a group setting.
Consider safety protocols, equipment conventions, and spatial or procedural norms. Note how and when that knowledge is communicated.
Consider noise, smell, lighting, temperature, and the density of people and equipment in the space.
Consider step sequencing, time allocations, equipment sharing arrangements, and group configurations.
Scan summary
Use the fields below to record your key observations across the environment you scanned. These are not conclusions — they are a starting point for a conversation with the people most affected by what you have found.
Note where the environment creates friction, places requirements on the person rather than on the system, or leaves needs unmet or met late.
Note any constraints in this environment — budget, technology, staffing, time — and how each might shape a more durable or equitable response to what you found.
Note what this scan suggests should happen next, who should be involved, and what questions remain that only the person most affected can answer.
Accessibility note: This version uses no JavaScript. All content is in reading order. Form fields are labelled with visible text. No information is conveyed through colour alone. WCAG 2.1 AA colour contrast is maintained throughout. An interactive version of this tool with a 3D rotating object and dynamic context selection is also available. If you encounter a barrier in either version, please get in touch.