Section 2
The 10 resources in this area
Each entry states what the resource contributes, what grounds it, whether a live page exists, the resources most like it within this area, and the connections that run beyond it.
Research-to-Practice Learning Systems
The master framework for moving evidence
Published resource
The conceptual architecture for how research and evidence reach the people who can use them, and change what they do. It is the centrepiece the other knowledge-mobilization contributions instantiate in specific contexts.
Grounding. Knowledge mobilization; implementation frameworks
Read the Research-to-Practice Learning Systems resource
Sources
- Reference 1: Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.
Most related, by shared theory and theme
Connected contributions
Where this work leads
KMb Evaluation Design
Did the evidence change practice?
Published resource
Measurement built for knowledge mobilization specifically — indicators of uptake and changed practice, not only satisfaction or reach. It is referenced by every other contribution in this area, and shared with the wider evaluation family.
Grounding. KMb indicators; evaluation design
Read the KMb Evaluation Design resource
Sources
- Reference 1: Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.
- Reference 2: Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler.
Most related, by shared theory and theme
Connected contributions
Where this work leads
Implementation Science Learning Design
Translating implementation frameworks into design
Published resource
Turning established implementation-science frameworks into concrete design decisions, giving change and needs work a theoretical backbone. It is a shared language among senior practitioners in health and the public sector.
Grounding. CFIR; EPIS; PARIHS
Read the Implementation Science Learning Design resource
Sources
- Reference 3: Damschroder, L. J., et al. (2009). “Fostering Implementation of Health Services Research Findings into Practice: A Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science (CFIR).” Implementation Science, 4:50.
- Reference 4: Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). “Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors (EPIS).” Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 38(1), 4–23.
- Reference 5: Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998). “Enabling the Implementation of Evidence Based Practice: A Conceptual Framework (PARIHS).” Quality in Health Care, 7(3), 149–158.
Most related, by shared theory and theme
Connected contributions
Where this work leads
Evidence Brief & Knowledge Product Design
Research outputs practitioners actually use
In development
Designing the artifacts that carry evidence — briefs, summaries, and tools — so they are usable by the people they are meant for. It is concrete, demonstrable, and widely hired for.
Grounding. Knowledge translation; information design
Sources
- Reference 6: Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Policy Press.
- Reference 1: Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.
Most related, by shared theory and theme
Connected contributions
Where this work leads
Co-Production & Participatory Design
Designing with knowledge users, not for them
In development
Involving the people who will use knowledge in designing how it moves — the integrated approach many research funders now expect. It draws directly on community design and facilitation.
Grounding. Integrated knowledge translation; participatory design
Sources
- Reference 1: Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.
- Reference 7: Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
Most related, by shared theory and theme
Connected contributions
Where this work leads
Policy & Public-Sector Knowledge Design
Rapid evidence to policy
In development
Designing evidence for the realities of policy process and the people who work within it, so research can inform decisions on the timelines government actually runs on.
Grounding. Evidence-informed policy; knowledge mobilization
Sources
- Reference 6: Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Policy Press.
Most related, by shared theory and theme
Connected contributions
Where this work leads
Researcher Capacity Building
Helping researchers mobilize their own knowledge
In development
Building researchers' capability to carry their own work into practice — the skillset behind the emerging research-impact roles in universities and research institutes.
Grounding. Capacity building; adult learning
Sources
- Reference 8: Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The Adult Learner (8th ed.). Routledge.
Most related, by shared theory and theme
Connected contributions
Where this work leads
Indigenous & Equity-Centred KMb
Power-aware, community-led knowledge movement
In development
Mobilizing knowledge in ways that respect data sovereignty, plural ways of knowing, and the communities knowledge comes from. It is developed in relationship and with care, not as token coverage.
This contribution is developed in consultation and relationship, not authored in isolation.
Grounding. OCAP®; Two-Eyed Seeing; equity-centred design
Sources
- Reference 9: The First Nations Information Governance Centre. The First Nations Principles of OCAP® (Ownership, Control, Access, Possession).
- Reference 10: Bartlett, C., Marshall, M., & Marshall, A. (2012). “Two-Eyed Seeing and Other Lessons Learned within a Co-Learning Journey of Bringing Together Indigenous and Mainstream Knowledges and Ways of Knowing.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2(4), 331–340.
Most related, by shared theory and theme
Connected contributions
Where this work leads
Digital & AI-Enabled KMb
AI-assisted access to evidence
In development
Using digital and AI tools to widen access to evidence and support its use, grounded in real knowledge-mobilization practice rather than novelty. It shares its production questions with scalable personalization.
Grounding. Learning technology; responsible AI
Sources
- Reference 1: Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.
Most related, by shared theory and theme
Connected contributions
Where this work leads
Communities of Practice Design for KMb
Peer structures that sustain evidence use
In development
Designing the peer-learning structures — communities of practice — that keep evidence in use over time rather than letting it fade after a single push. It is the knowledge-mobilization application of community design and facilitation.
Grounding. Communities of practice (Wenger)
Sources
- Reference 7: Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
- Reference 1: Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.
Most related, by shared theory and theme
Connected contributions
Where this work leads
An interactive version of this area map presents the same content as a navigable diagram, and the full practice landscape sets it beside the other areas.