Learning Design Specialization

Knowledge Mobilization

Area · moving evidence into practice. Every resource in this area, with its grounding, sources, and relationships, set out in reading order.

Screen reader and keyboard optimised version. All content is presented in reading order, with no diagram, tabs, or scripting. An interactive version of this area map is also available.

Section 1

About this area

The design of how research and evidence reach the people who can use them, and change what they do. This area gathers the contributions that turn knowledge into usable, evaluated, and sustained practice across sectors.

Grounding. Knowledge mobilization; implementation science

This area at a glance
Resources in this area10
With a live page3
In development7

See this area in the context of the whole practice.

Section 2

The 10 resources in this area

Each entry states what the resource contributes, what grounds it, whether a live page exists, the resources most like it within this area, and the connections that run beyond it.

Research-to-Practice Learning Systems

The master framework for moving evidence

Published resource

The conceptual architecture for how research and evidence reach the people who can use them, and change what they do. It is the centrepiece the other knowledge-mobilization contributions instantiate in specific contexts.

Grounding. Knowledge mobilization; implementation frameworks

Read the Research-to-Practice Learning Systems resource

Sources

  • Reference 1: Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.

Most related, by shared theory and theme

Connected contributions

Where this work leads

KMb Evaluation Design

Did the evidence change practice?

Published resource

Measurement built for knowledge mobilization specifically — indicators of uptake and changed practice, not only satisfaction or reach. It is referenced by every other contribution in this area, and shared with the wider evaluation family.

Grounding. KMb indicators; evaluation design

Read the KMb Evaluation Design resource

Sources

  • Reference 1: Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.
  • Reference 2: Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler.

Most related, by shared theory and theme

Connected contributions

Where this work leads

Implementation Science Learning Design

Translating implementation frameworks into design

Published resource

Turning established implementation-science frameworks into concrete design decisions, giving change and needs work a theoretical backbone. It is a shared language among senior practitioners in health and the public sector.

Grounding. CFIR; EPIS; PARIHS

Read the Implementation Science Learning Design resource

Sources

  • Reference 3: Damschroder, L. J., et al. (2009). “Fostering Implementation of Health Services Research Findings into Practice: A Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science (CFIR).” Implementation Science, 4:50.
  • Reference 4: Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). “Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors (EPIS).” Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 38(1), 4–23.
  • Reference 5: Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998). “Enabling the Implementation of Evidence Based Practice: A Conceptual Framework (PARIHS).” Quality in Health Care, 7(3), 149–158.

Most related, by shared theory and theme

Connected contributions

Where this work leads

Evidence Brief & Knowledge Product Design

Research outputs practitioners actually use

In development

Designing the artifacts that carry evidence — briefs, summaries, and tools — so they are usable by the people they are meant for. It is concrete, demonstrable, and widely hired for.

Grounding. Knowledge translation; information design

Sources

  • Reference 6: Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Policy Press.
  • Reference 1: Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.

Most related, by shared theory and theme

Connected contributions

Where this work leads

Co-Production & Participatory Design

Designing with knowledge users, not for them

In development

Involving the people who will use knowledge in designing how it moves — the integrated approach many research funders now expect. It draws directly on community design and facilitation.

Grounding. Integrated knowledge translation; participatory design

Sources

  • Reference 1: Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.
  • Reference 7: Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.

Most related, by shared theory and theme

Connected contributions

Where this work leads

Policy & Public-Sector Knowledge Design

Rapid evidence to policy

In development

Designing evidence for the realities of policy process and the people who work within it, so research can inform decisions on the timelines government actually runs on.

Grounding. Evidence-informed policy; knowledge mobilization

Sources

  • Reference 6: Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Policy Press.

Most related, by shared theory and theme

Connected contributions

Where this work leads

Researcher Capacity Building

Helping researchers mobilize their own knowledge

In development

Building researchers' capability to carry their own work into practice — the skillset behind the emerging research-impact roles in universities and research institutes.

Grounding. Capacity building; adult learning

Sources

  • Reference 8: Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The Adult Learner (8th ed.). Routledge.

Most related, by shared theory and theme

Connected contributions

Where this work leads

Indigenous & Equity-Centred KMb

Power-aware, community-led knowledge movement

In development

Mobilizing knowledge in ways that respect data sovereignty, plural ways of knowing, and the communities knowledge comes from. It is developed in relationship and with care, not as token coverage.

This contribution is developed in consultation and relationship, not authored in isolation.

Grounding. OCAP®; Two-Eyed Seeing; equity-centred design

Sources

  • Reference 9: The First Nations Information Governance Centre. The First Nations Principles of OCAP® (Ownership, Control, Access, Possession).
  • Reference 10: Bartlett, C., Marshall, M., & Marshall, A. (2012). “Two-Eyed Seeing and Other Lessons Learned within a Co-Learning Journey of Bringing Together Indigenous and Mainstream Knowledges and Ways of Knowing.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2(4), 331–340.

Most related, by shared theory and theme

Connected contributions

Where this work leads

Digital & AI-Enabled KMb

AI-assisted access to evidence

In development

Using digital and AI tools to widen access to evidence and support its use, grounded in real knowledge-mobilization practice rather than novelty. It shares its production questions with scalable personalization.

Grounding. Learning technology; responsible AI

Sources

  • Reference 1: Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.

Most related, by shared theory and theme

Connected contributions

Where this work leads

Communities of Practice Design for KMb

Peer structures that sustain evidence use

In development

Designing the peer-learning structures — communities of practice — that keep evidence in use over time rather than letting it fade after a single push. It is the knowledge-mobilization application of community design and facilitation.

Grounding. Communities of practice (Wenger)

Sources

  • Reference 7: Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
  • Reference 1: Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.

Most related, by shared theory and theme

Connected contributions

Where this work leads

Section 3

References and resources

The theory and knowledge underpinning the resources in this area, cited by number above. Peer-reviewed and institutional sources link directly. Books and reports are cited in full so they can be found in any library catalogue.

  1. Knowledge mobilization1. Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24.
  2. Evaluation2. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler.
  3. Implementation science3. Damschroder, L. J., et al. (2009). “Fostering Implementation of Health Services Research Findings into Practice: A Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science (CFIR).” Implementation Science, 4:50.
    https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
  4. Implementation science4. Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). “Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors (EPIS).” Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 38(1), 4–23.
  5. Implementation science5. Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998). “Enabling the Implementation of Evidence Based Practice: A Conceptual Framework (PARIHS).” Quality in Health Care, 7(3), 149–158.
  6. Evidence use6. Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Policy Press.
  7. Social learning7. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Adult learning8. Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The Adult Learner (8th ed.). Routledge.
  9. Indigenous data governance9. The First Nations Information Governance Centre. The First Nations Principles of OCAP® (Ownership, Control, Access, Possession).
    https://fnigc.ca/ocap-training/
  10. Indigenous knowledge10. Bartlett, C., Marshall, M., & Marshall, A. (2012). “Two-Eyed Seeing and Other Lessons Learned within a Co-Learning Journey of Bringing Together Indigenous and Mainstream Knowledges and Ways of Knowing.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2(4), 331–340.

Back to contents

An interactive version of this area map presents the same content as a navigable diagram, and the full practice landscape sets it beside the other areas.