3Before anyone asks

Week three. The advisor reads the course outline closely before meeting the instructor.

The questionWhich of these barriers did the course’s design put there, and which are owed to Rowan individually?
What to read
A good decision looks like

Three findings go into the file. The one-absence rule and the fixed deadlines are design choices. A second permitted absence and a short grace window on submissions would have met two of Rowan’s three requests with no letter, no disclosure, and no advisor, and would have served the learners in the same room who will never make a request at all. Those two findings become a note for the instructor now and material for the seventh stop later.

The two findings have a place in the design framework they come from. Attendance and deadline architecture are matters of engagement in the Universal Design for Learning Guidelines; the form of the practical is a matter of action and expression (source 23). Human variability is the rule in any learning environment rather than the exception (source 24), which is why a design change made for one learner reaches many. It does not reach all: a grace window still has an edge, and a difficult stretch can outlast it. Design reduces the individual duty; it does not discharge it (source 25).

The timed practical is different. It may be measuring something, and whether it is cannot be settled by the advisor alone. It is held for the fifth stop.